Saturday, March 27, 2010

'Formula One is seriously boring now' - Stirling Moss

I can't think of anything much more boring than the Bahrain Grand Prix. I watched the race from hospital alongside my good friend Professor Sid Watkins and I have to say I wasn't impressed.

The concern is that we could miss out on a fantastic season of motor racing. There are so many great drivers in competitive cars but it is near impossible for them to actually race against each other.

Frankly, I think the FIA and the constructors should do something about it. Fundamentally they need to put an end to Formula One's dependency on downforce; the amount these cars can produce is remarkable. In my era downforce wasn't even a word. I would say the highest lateral G-Force that I or anybody else could ever get would be under 1G. But now, I mean my God, when they back off entering a corner they've got 4G.

The most recent car I drove was a Tyrrell about 10 or 15 years ago and I could not believe its performance. I was coming into a corner at about 170mph, I backed off as normal, but then I had to accelerate again because I hadn't expected the drag from the aerodynamics to slow me down so much. And that was in an old car by today's standards, so the current ones must be ridiculous.

So I think we need to look at stripping the cars back rather than adding anything, and make sure we cut right back on the electronics that take away from the rudiments of driving. Right now I would rather see a good IndyCar race than I would a Formula One race, because it is far more entertaining to watch. Formula One as a spectator sport is pretty near zero at the moment.

I would rather see a good IndyCar race than I would a Formula One race, because it is far more entertaining to watch

One of the main problems is that the driver input is restricted by such a huge amount, and that reduces the advantage of having an Alonso, or a Vettel or a Hamilton on your team. The opportunity for them to demonstrate their skill is minimal and that's a great shame.

If we want to put it back into the driver's hands we need to make the cars more difficult to drive. That's not to say they're easy, but considering you can take the top twenty drivers in the world and the difference in lap time can be less than a second from front to back, then there has to be something wrong - there's no two ways about it. The driver's role is cut down so much that you hardly ever see them lock a brake or get any wheelspin - they don't even make proper gear changes. I think that is bad news.

These modern circuits such as Bahrain don't help either. They are beautifully presented but actually make for pretty boring racing, and sadly one has to say that of most circuits now in Formula One. Comparing them to the ones I used to race, in my opinion there is only Monaco that is still interesting and that's about it. I suppose it's inevitable given the focus on safety, which has ruined and emasculated motor racing. But there you go, that's the way it has to be.

Racing was much closer in Sir Stirling Moss' day © Getty Images

There are suggestions of bringing in shortcuts for overtaking or reversing the grid, and although they are undoubtedly gimmicks, they would make the racing more exciting. I don't disagree that it would create a poor man's version of the sport, but Formula One in my mind no longer holds the prestige that it did or should. I'd rather we found a more sensible solution, such as addressing the aerodynamics, but if we can't get round that problem then I'd rather we had those gimmicks than nothing. It's unfortunate I have to say that, but it's seriously boring now.

Putting F1's problems to one side, there are some interesting battles emerging within some of the teams.

To pick just one, I've found the competition between the McLaren drivers Jenson Button and Lewis Hamilton particularly interesting. Lewis beat Jenson in Bahrain quite comprehensively, and although there is a long way to go this season, I think that was a fair reflection of their talents. Jenson is a great world champion and has done a terrific job but I don't think he has as much ability as Lewis. I think Lewis is more of a competitor and more of a fighter. Jenson's strength lies in his ability to conserve tyres, but now the Bridgestones have proved to be particularly durable, that has gone against him. And if they bring in compulsory second stops, which is an idea being mooted to improve the show, it will go against him even more so.

Looking ahead to this weekend's race, I think we can expect a much more exciting atmosphere. First of all it's in Australia which is so sports orientated and secondly the circuit is more interesting to look at because it's more of a road rather than a track. So I think we can look forward to, not necessarily a more competitive race, but certainly a more interesting one. I suspect the order at the front will remain the same, it's been just two weeks since the first race, so I can't imagine anybody will pop up and have us all saying "Christ, where did he come from". Whatever happens I'll be watching and I'll let you know my views in my next column.

No one to catch the Bulls....Insanity!!!

Red Bulls are ridiculously fast. I mean today in Australia qualy they cleared the field, except Fernando, by more that .6 secs ....!!! .6 secs over a single lap??? Madness...utter madness....

McLaren's Martin Whitmarsh has suggested Red Bull's car might be hiding a controversial driver-adjustable ride-height system, after the two RB6s dominated qualifying in Melbourne.

The difference between a car laden with fuel for the start of the race and one running on fumes in qualifying is so great that the weight of the petrol physically alters the height of the car. This means most teams have to run the car relatively high in qualifying, at a disadvantage, in order to compensate for the weight of the full tank needed to start the race. But during qualifying on Saturday, on-board footage from Mark Webber's Red Bull appeared to show the car occasionally bottoming-out.

McLaren boss Whitmarsh told the BBC after the session that, following a similar situation in Bahrain, he wondered why the Red Bulls were not "dragging their arses on full tanks" in the race. He said it is "evidence of ride-height control systems" being in use, "which many people wouldn't have thought were permissible".

Saturday, March 13, 2010

2010- Season begins....

It seems to be what one may call 'The Year' after so long...The budget cap has begin to bring in effetcs it seems....teams are on much more equal footing then before....(remember the streamlined Mercedes in 50s, or the Chapman's fan; Williams v Mclaren of 80s or the recent domination by Ferrari?) It seems to be all nearing the tunnel's end!! Well The Big Four (Mclaren, Ferrari, RedBull, Mercedes) are clear favorites. But then we have Willaims and Sauber and Force India looking good...and then there are Renault too..
Today is the first qualifying. Just an hour or so and we still do not know who is heading where?

Well the teams that looks strongest is Ferrari (with Fernando). Its bookies' favorite and mine as well. It had the upper hand all through the winter testing ( and lately,half an hour before, Fernando has topped the time charts for Saturday practice). It does'nt show signs of defiance or lack of anything..
Red Bull will be strong, though they didnt have a good weekend at Bahrain so far but many including Bernie and Stewart are tipping Vettle for the title.
Mercedes seems to be in middle. Micheal is off the pace. Even Nico is fast. Micheal accepts that he is still "rusty" and need to raise his game.
Williams, Sauber and Force India have shown pace at different occassions. I will watch Kobayashi and Force India. Rest , STR, HRT, Lotus, Virgin, shows not much promise.

McLaren has done sth innovative..The rear wing , yet again (You listening Ross?). Bob Bell is furious. Christian Horner is on his feets. Brawn says they will create their own version. The impact of it would be interesting to see. Well in Friday practice Mclaren suffered from rear tire wear the most... The thing is that as per the FIA regulations teams can not employ and such part in there car which is movable (apart from the allowed adjustable front wing). Now what McLaren has allegdly done is that its drivers are using their knee to stall a air stream gwhich goes toward the rear wing. This allegdely results in an extra speed advantages of upto 6 mph on straights.
Charlie Whiting has giver it a go green.

Button was initially coy when asked about the device before then adding: "Our wing is our wing, and that's the way it is."There's no problem with it as it's been passed by the authorities. It's an innovative design and it seems to be working well. "We all want more downforce, but aerodynamically and with our straight-line speed we're reasonably happy with where we are."

Renault's managing director Bob Bell has been one of the most outspoken critics of Whiting's decision, pointing an accusing finger at the FIA. "It is fundamentally clear the McLaren wing design is totally illegal," complained Bell. "It is a complete joke," he thundered to the BBC. "It has driven a horse and cart straight through the rule that teams cannot use moveable aerodynamic devices on their cars. It is fundamentally illegally. "At a time when we are trying to cut costs, this will just start a new arms race. The FIA have acted irresponsibly."

Christian Horner has revealed that Red Bull are unlikely to protest McLaren's rear wing, instead they'll look to develop their "own version."

Lotus Lotus technical chief Mike Gascoyne believes the system, which reportedly works by the drivers blocking a pipe in their cockpit with their kneeds, is a "moveable" aerodynamic device.

"I still believe it's a moveable aerodynamic device because the configuration of the (car's) aerodynamics are changing," said Gascoyne.